Teachers vote no to new HSTA contract offer

Reported by: Brianne Randle
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 1/19 9:56 pm

Teachers statewide took to their polling place to vote on a new 6-year contract.

Of the 13,000 HSTA union members - 9,000 showed up to weigh in. Only 33% voted in favor of the deal - while 67% resoundingly rejected it.

"The message is clear, they do not want this contract.  I cannot speculate on the outcome but we will find out what the situation is," said Wil Okabe, HSTA President.

This is the first time teachers have rejected a deal for a new contract that the union board of directors supported.

What many teachers say weighed heavily on their minds, was that the contract would have allowed teachers to be rewarded with raises based on performance evaluations, beginning in 2013.  But, how the state would go about "evaluating" teachers was unclear.

"I think the union did a bad job in getting information to the teachers about the new evaluation system that the state wants to implement," said Katie Nakamura, Noelani Elementary school teacher.

The contract would have meant a 50-50 medical split, an increase in personal leave from 5 days to 6 for each school year, and teachers salaries would be restored to the 2009 levels before furloughs in June 2013.  Those who supported it said it was a good deal.

"We're the only union getting our pay restored we're asking for more than that, we're getting a 1% after that.  We're trying to squeeze water out of dust, I don't know what else to expect beyond that," said Howard Chi, Stevenson Intermediate school teacher.

HSTA says it will now consider all options for moving forward.  That could mean teachers will have to live with the state's 2-year 'last, best and final" offer.  Or the union could call for a strike vote.  Another route would be to continue its legal challenge with the state before the labor relations board.  A move that impacts Hawaii's share of millions in federal Race to the Top funds.

"The most important thing we're going to do is to ask our members, have meetings with members to see exactly what we can do," said Okabe.

The HSTA says the board of directors will meet Saturday to discuss it options and hopes to hear from teachers in the next few weeks on what to do next.

Share
17 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

heymiss - 1/20/2012 5:10 PM
0 Votes
That anti-bullying curriculum has finally kicked in - we stood up to the HSTA leadership. I hope that the public understands that, for most of us, our oppositon to the contract was about the evaluations. I am eager for a chance to show off, but I want the process to be fair for everyone. Why can't we at least look at what other districts are doing and tweak it to serve our needs. HSTA and the state are making this ordeal more difficult than it needs to be. Let's test some pilot programs and use the one(s) that work best. The talk of strike came from HSTA leadership as a scare tactic, not as something that most members want. Please don't confuse teachers with the HSTA. We seem to have little in common

FlyingBubo - 1/20/2012 3:37 PM
0 Votes
Simple fact remains that our state do not have enough money to make everyone happy. Those days are so gone, you can't even see their jetstreams any more. Every public employees from teachers, cops, firefighters and so on will be looking at hard times ahead. Only one who will not will be the politicians who may vote themselves a new pay raise. Where will the money come from? More taxes sure but you can only tax so much. Simply put, standards of living in our state will go down. We are too fat, too much welfare, too many employees and no money to go around.

AnEducatedMULE - 1/20/2012 12:51 PM
2 Votes
Major respect for the teachers. It's refreshing that they don't blindly follow what the union bosses say, rather, (and this is a rarity now days) they thought for themselves. Teachers deserve much, much better than what the State has offered them. And on another note, we need to get rid of unions, or at least diminish their power in Hawai'i. They are the reason why we see no progress here as opposed to the mainland. Union leaders are, as we've just seen in this case, seriously out of touch with its members.

easylivin - 1/20/2012 10:14 AM
2 Votes
Boot the rail and give our teachers better conditions!!!!

snflwr28 - 1/20/2012 6:07 AM
2 Votes
Even in the news reports now, no one is fully explaining all the reasons that teachers voted no to this deal. First, our personal leave was increased by a day but our sick leave was decreased by a day, so we still have 18 days a year total. That is not anything to get excited about. Second, they say our pay will be restored to 2009 pre-furlough levels... this was actually our contract agreed pay scales from June 2007 to June 2009. This means that when the new teacher evaluations to determine pay increases is started in June 2013, we will have been paid the same or less for 6 years already. And our actual take home pay will be closer to 2006 levels because of the increase in medical contributions from 40% to 50%. AND we are no longer guaranteed a pay increase to account for inflation, we will have to pass an evaluation system that hasn't been developed yet in order to move up in pay. I have doubts about my union because my union president has been repeatedly quoted saying that we have three choices at this point: 1. live with the Last Best and Final Offer (LBFO) 2. strike and 3. continue our legal battle over the LBFO. If the Race to the Top Money really is in jeapordy, I don't understand why there is not an option 4. the state and the union continue to negotiate to reach a better deal that takes these teacher concerns into account. The media tells me that the recession is over. Average pay in increasing in the private sector. Spending is going back up... etc. Why then is the state of Hawaii still taking away from its public workers. And if we can afford a rail system no one wants, why can't the state restore pay to all of its public workers?

kauhale - 1/20/2012 4:48 AM
2 Votes
I am not a suporter for unions I believe public unions are a big problem in the nation. Having said that I agree with the teachers saying no to this agreement. The evaluation process was never spelled out so there is nonway anyone should vote yes for something like that. In my opinion this was a political and completely unethical tactic done by the troll and the head of the hsta to bully the teachers to accept this rediculouse offer because of the race to the top situation. All u have to do is put the pieces together, Hawaii goes on a list that puts us at high risk of losing the funding and poof an agreement is made. Now if the agreement is not ratified its the teachers fault if we lose the funding. Don't be fooled abercrombie himself said that the contract process was not a factor whenit comes to race to the top but if I'm right we will hear him or someone in his administration say that it does. By the way the union members should consider what they are gonna do about the representatives that actually agreed to this contract.

kimokeo70 - 1/19/2012 10:22 PM
0 Votes
Ok I gotta admit I never expected that my fellow Teachers would vote no to new HSTA contract . So his song is dedicated to all the teachers who voted no and believe the new tentative agreement between the HSTA board and the state is a joke and a slap in the face to teachers. Enjoy http://www.internetdj.com/song/90888

MamaDinosaur - 1/19/2012 10:19 PM
2 Votes
Incredulous, I suggest you stop repeating fallacies about taxes and unions. Unions haven't squeezed anyone dry. Everyone who works in the private sector has a union to thank for their benefits, their pay, their work safety. Also, everyone pays taxes. Everyone who earns a paycheck pays income taxes. Don't even take FICA into consideration; federal income taxes get paid by the a majority of Americans, while state, city, county, sales, and excise taxes get paid by everyone. Rent a house? A portion of your rent went to pay the owner's property taxes. Drive a car? You pay for registration. Ride a bike? Gotta register that, too. What's incredulous is that you think your lies are truths. I guess what they say is true; facts DO have a liberal bias.

KapoleiKurgan - 1/19/2012 10:18 PM
1 Vote
Smart move teachers! Only an incredulous loser would vote "yes" for a contract that proposes an evaluation process but doesn't tell you what standards you'll be evaluated on. Guess the attempt to play you for fools failed. Next tactic: bully you in the press for not agreeing to their "demands". As a leader in the private sector, I've fuond that its not uncommon for less ethical businesses to manage their payroll by setting standards that can't be met. At least you won't have that Homer Simpson feeling (doh!) in a few years when the state conveniently fails to fund the increases but moves forward with the evaluation process because, well, you agreed to it in the contract!

incredulous - 1/19/2012 9:40 PM
1 Vote
Unions and entitlements have squeezed us producers dry and we are feeling abused. Half the people pay no income taxes as it is, and those of us that do are wrung dry. You've run out of other people's money!

Editors' Choice

Connect with KHON2

Apple iPhone App Google Android App Other Phones E-mail Alerts Facebook Fan Page Twitter News Feed Send Photos and Videos Submit News Tips
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.

Click for the BBB Business Review of this Television Stations & Broadcast Companies in Honolulu HI      © 2012 New Vision Television |  Site Map |  Terms of Use |  Privacy Statement |  FCC Compliance |  Employment |  Advertise on KHON2 |  Contact Us