Bill Would Ban Fluorescents From Landfills

Reported by: Andrew Pereira
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/11/2010 7:04 pm

STORY SUMMARY>>>

It wasn’t as if a light bulb blinked above Hawaii Rep. Ken Ito’s head.  Instead, a friend simply told him about the problem posed by fluorescent and compact fluorescent bulbs – mercury dust.

“Every year so many millions come to Hawaii and we have no way to address the mercury content,” the Windward Oahu democrat told Khon2.  

Ito’s solution is to ban all fluorescents from entering state landfills. 

So far the reception to Ito’s measure has been positive.   The bill (HB 2922) has passed four committees and is supported by the Hawaii chapter of the Sierra Club.

In addition to posing a hazard to Hawaii’s water supply, mercury dust found in fluorescents can also become airborne, leading to severe health issues in humans.

“Some people have brain damage, intestinal bleeding (and) it can shut down kidneys,” said Ito.     

Waste Management Inc., the operators of Waimanalo Gulch Landfill in Leeward Oahu are watching Ito’s bill closely and support its intent.  The measure would require all landfills to post signs warning customers that fluorescents are prohibited while also mailing out periodic news letters.

WMI Community Affairs Manager Russell Nanod says commercial clients are already banned from dumping fluorescents into landfills under EPA rules - however the rules don’t apply to homeowners. 

Nanod says even if Ito’s bill were to become law, the effort to educate residents about throwing fluorescent light bulbs into the trash would need to continue.

I think there's always going to be that challenge of how do you implement this with everybody throughout the state of Hawaii,” he said. 

Currently there is no recycling facility for fluorescents in the entire state.  National hardware chain Home Depot has a program in place that accepts the bulbs at no cost to customers. 

However anyone who wants to properly rid themselves of the energy saving bulbs directly for their homes must ship them to the mainland in recycling kits that typically costs $17.00 for a box that holds thirteen fluorescents.

 On Thursday Ito’s bill passed two more committee votes, but a key amendment was added.  Lawmakers inserted language that all retailers who sell fluorescent bulbs must accept them back from consumers.

Have a news tip?  Contact Andrew Pereira at 368-7273.

Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

2badd - 3/15/2010 12:42 AM
Someone has finally seen the light. Make the retailers take the bulbs back regardless of where you bought them. The mercury will eventually leach into the water table, especially if CFL disposal isn't made easy for the consumer otherwise they will wind up along side the road or in the brush somewhere. This idea should also apply to the bottle bill. Lets not create another bureaucracy and put more money into the State coffers to be wasted. Remember you pay 6 cents extra on that container, but only get 5 cents back.

Beachchick - 3/12/2010 12:00 PM
The proper disposal of these bulbs should have been in place a long time ago, the ingredients are not changed as long as the bulbs have been in circulation. I think it is great that they are no longer allowed on landfills posing a risk to contaminate earth and water. The manufacturer will of course put the cost on the consumer, but it should be worth it to us. Either way we are paying, bleeding heart liberal or not as someone tried to put into the conversation. If you do not pay for the proper disposal, then your tax money will pay for proper clean up, and that is money taken away to keep other community services going. I really do not see how rail comes into the picture here, but again, figure the cost of oil and the naval ships that are steadily deployed to protect the oil wells on a taxpayers dime, consider the roads that are steadily crumbling under the heavy SUV's driving on them, and consider the tax money to protect air ports and what have you, then you will see that public transport is ALWAYS tax subsidized. The notion that rail is the only cost factor when it comes to tax money is simply wrong. And after all, it is all for the public, and will add to the quality of life for many.

96706 - 3/12/2010 10:51 AM
once again it's "damn if we do, damn if we don't".

JuanDeLaCruz - 3/12/2010 9:43 AM
First they tell use to use flourescents because they are ecologically friendly and use less energy. Now they will cost more by forcing retailers to accept the old bulbs. These are the same people who wants rail. That will be another white elephant costing the state billions a year to operate. First they will make it cheaper to students and seniors and then govt employees and the handicapped and then other bleeding heart liberal reason. Leave the working people alone. They know best how to make ends meet.

Editors' Choice

Connect with KHON2

Apple iPhone App Google Android App Other Phones E-mail Alerts Facebook Fan Page Twitter News Feed Send Photos and Videos Submit News Tips
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.

Click for the BBB Business Review of this Television Stations & Broadcast Companies in Honolulu HI      © 2012 New Vision Television |  Site Map |  Terms of Use |  Privacy Statement |  FCC Compliance |  Employment |  Advertise on KHON2 |  Contact Us