HB444 veto could play role in future of Hawaii's tourism

Reported by: Gina Mangieri
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 7/07/2010 8:18 pm

Governor Lingle's veto of the civil unions bill yesterday triggered an avalanche of phone calls to her office on Wednesday.

Words of praise and criticism poured in from around the nation.

Wednesday morning the governor's office was inundated with calls regarding the veto of House Bill 444.

The governor's receptionist says some of the callers used a word the state's tourism industry doesn't want to hear.

"There's a good portion of them that were planning on vacationing here but because of the veto they will cancel their vacations and spread the word to their friends to boycott Hawaii," says Kaui Alapa, who is Governor Lingle's receptionist.

Gay tourism accounts for more than 60 billion in economic impact nationwide and a movement has already begun to steer away Hawaii's share.

From Facebook to twitter to the news and commentary stream, it kicked into gear not long after the governor vetoed civil unions -- fighting back by hitting Hawaii's number one industry , tourism.

"Especially out on the west coast of talk of boycotting Hawaii," says Alan Spector with Equality Hawaii.

That's new territory for Hawaii and something already on the radar of the travel establishment, especially as high profile niche trips build momentum in Hawaii. The hawaii tourism authority told KHON2

"At this time, we are monitoring and assessing the situation to determine any appropriate response."

"We would abide by a boycott for awhile. Yes, oh yes. Greg and I were here in january, I've been here 7 or 8 times since I was a young kid," says Washington visitor Dan Burpee.

Hula's Bar and Lei Stand celebrates its 36th year on thursday and the owner says he's never seen this kind of reaction over his decades in business.

"At least 50 percent of my business is from the mainland. Hulas bar and lei stand could not survive on just a local clientèle," says Jack Law of Hula's Bar and Lei Stand.

"Our visitor economy is so interrelated that what hurts everybody."

Gay visitors say they sympathize and for that reason any boycott might be short lived.

"I wouldn't look to support that boycott for a long period of time because the people suffer, but the governor needs to realize that it's not just her, it's the people," says Washington visitor Greg Wolf.

Others say they'd ignore a call to bypass Hawaii.

"I will not abide by the boycott. I think hawaii is a beautiful area and it's a very welcoming city. I think by boycotting it just helps create that frustration and it just punishes the local LGBT community even more than anything else," says California visitor Steve Campo.

Experts have a mixed view -- opposing sides each had economists weigh in. the civil union supporters camp said Hawaii's tourism economy stood to grow had same sex couples been able to come here for civil union ceremonies. civil union opponents said there would be no economic benefit.

Share
12 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

DC808 - 7/20/2010 3:37 PM
Boycotting Hawaii is one of the stupidest, non-realistic ideas I have ever heard. It is ridiculous that a few angry bloggers think that they could unite all the homosexuals by writing a post on a news article, let alone cause Hawaii's economy to collapse by doing so.

kailuaohana - 7/10/2010 10:20 AM
We dont want Honolulu turning into little San Francisco. Tourism will go on. Get over your selves!!

bcincalgary - 7/9/2010 1:37 PM
I will return to Hawaii (the land that I love) but will be very careful where I spend my Gay dollar: Boycott the Mormon-owned Polynesian Cultural Centre, given the Mormon agenda against same sex marriage, for example.

lhines - 7/9/2010 12:55 PM
I am going to book a vacation in Hawaii right now. Im also going to encourage all my coworkers, friends and family to book their next vacation there. Why should the already suffering economy of Hawaii hit the people even harder because outsiders dont like a decision made by its governor? A boycott will severely damage the lives of the people in Hawaii. Why cant the LGBT community find a way to aim their efforts at the governor only? Why must so many people lose money and jobs because of their beef with one person? It seems to me that when the LGBT community doesnt get their way, a lot of uninvolved people pay the price (ie. the film "The Mormon Proposition"). I urge the LGBT to stop throwing your weight around everytime you dont get what you want.

certifyed808 - 7/8/2010 1:47 PM
let the people decide.. the legislature is just bored and doing shiet just to get attention.. lets make real decisions, on real life problems.. thank you lingle.. real problems= state funds going to micronesians instead of people of hawaii who need it.. paying 60,000 in cost a year for each inmate in prison.. id say cut that fund too.. go san francisco for your equal rights.. we got enough different flags flying over here already!!!

TrueHI - 7/8/2010 12:35 PM
I don't see the big deal about the LGBT community not visiting Hawaii. I don't know the numbers but come on, its a selfish perspective to think that the LGBT will cause such an economic collapse if they don't visit. On the otherhand, maybe Hawaii's tourism may grow further because of the absence of LGBT tourism. Yes, extending health benefits to LGBT is necessary but that was what the health reform was SUPPOSED to be. Nag on Obama. Getting these benefits should NOT be achieved by changing our constitution. The people of Hawaii already voted against this and was there a significant drop of overall tourism after Hawaii voted on the matter in 1997? There are talks that the view of LGBT is changing so why not put it on the ballot? Hawaii is NOT ONLY a place, but is defined by its the people. Hawaii is in danger of LGBT individuals who are trying to change Hawaii and its people. If you are from Hawaii, let our true ALOHA colors shine proudly and let not this group of people change our lifestyle.

RCinSoCal - 7/8/2010 8:50 AM
-BOYCOTT HAWAII- Cancel all vacations there and suggest others do the same. They don't want us there then they should not have our dollars either. They say "we just don't want the name 'marriage' used", so the legislatures went for Civil Unions...well that's not good enough still, because it is really discrimination they are after. -BOYCOTT HAWAII-

swede508 - 7/8/2010 8:23 AM
Before anyone is judged for their preference in a partner, the bible thumping group should really look at the basis of what they are defending. Let us not forget the many leaders of the Hebrew nation that were allowed by their God to have more than one partner and how difficult it was for the women in these relationships to step agree to these arrangements. Keep religion out and basic human rights will win every time.

mauimom88 - 7/7/2010 11:31 PM
I am straight, and I am disappointed again to see the civil liberties of homosexuals demolished yet again. I understand that many people are 'against' homosexuality, although it is difficult for me to comprehend, as it has been proven again and again that homosexuality is NOT a choice, but rather what someone is when they are born. Therefore, I find it offensive, when I hear "christians" speaking on behalf of a god, who speaks of love, acceptance, and non-judgement more than any other ideals in the bible. Civil unions are a way to ensure homosexuals the rights they deserve under our constitution. Civil unions should not be put on the ballot, as the ignorant and angry will decide on the rights of a minority. At one time, noone believed in outlawing slavery or giving women the right to vote, but courageous congressmen took a stand and extended civil rights to groups that were being denied. This is a representative government. We elect people to make decisions that are fair and just, and granting homosexuals their their right to happiness does not infringe on my rights, therefore our brave leaders must look only at the constitution, the law of the land, and choose what is right over what is popular.

Laura808 - 7/7/2010 8:25 PM
sesma - I'm sorry about the loss of your brother, but illicit sex does NOT define the homosexual community. AIDS is NOT a gay disease. God loves all of his children. Let him, our creator, be my judge and jury. You do not have the power, scientific knowledge, or right to say that homosexuality is a "choice." Your brother died because he led an unsafe sexual lifestyle. THAT was his choice. He did not CHOOSE to be gay. He CHOSE to have unprotected sexual intercourse with another man who happened to have AIDS, and he paid the ultimate price. That is life! You do not have the power, knowledge, or right to tell me that I do not deserve the same civil liberties that you enjoy. I will not remain a second class citizen in our great nation. I deserve a life of equality, because I am human, I am an American, and I deserve better than this. (I deserve everything that you have a "right" to)

Editors' Choice

Connect with KHON2

Apple iPhone App Google Android App Other Phones E-mail Alerts Facebook Fan Page Twitter News Feed Send Photos and Videos Submit News Tips
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.

Click for the BBB Business Review of this Television Stations & Broadcast Companies in Honolulu HI      © 2012 New Vision Television |  Site Map |  Terms of Use |  Privacy Statement |  FCC Compliance |  Employment |  Advertise on KHON2 |  Contact Us